<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PubSubHubbub &#8211; the not quite real time web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.caplin.com/2010/03/08/pubsubhubbub-the-not-quite-real-time-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.caplin.com/2010/03/08/pubsubhubbub-the-not-quite-real-time-web/</link>
	<description>Single Dealer Platforms, Industry Expertise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Inniss</title>
		<link>http://blog.caplin.com/2010/03/08/pubsubhubbub-the-not-quite-real-time-web/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Inniss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.caplin.com/?p=1559#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Well RssCloud had been specified in 2001 which is similar but less elegant solution . But it always takes something easier to use to get it going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well RssCloud had been specified in 2001 which is similar but less elegant solution . But it always takes something easier to use to get it going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Tyler</title>
		<link>http://blog.caplin.com/2010/03/08/pubsubhubbub-the-not-quite-real-time-web/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.caplin.com/?p=1559#comment-622</guid>
		<description>I agree it isn&#039;t necessarily a big problem - I just want to make it clear that PuSH doesnt mean all the way to clients. 

I don&#039;t think the server to server aspect that PuSH does solve was particularly difficult either, but it still took years before anyone bothered doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it isn&#8217;t necessarily a big problem &#8211; I just want to make it clear that PuSH doesnt mean all the way to clients. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the server to server aspect that PuSH does solve was particularly difficult either, but it still took years before anyone bothered doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Inniss</title>
		<link>http://blog.caplin.com/2010/03/08/pubsubhubbub-the-not-quite-real-time-web/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Inniss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.caplin.com/?p=1559#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Its only a small step for the server to push the updates to the readers. Obviously its not necessary to use the HTTP protocol with readers but i still think its a small step</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its only a small step for the server to push the updates to the readers. Obviously its not necessary to use the HTTP protocol with readers but i still think its a small step</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

